25 October 2009

Flu

I don’t believe anyone should be compelled or coerced to get a flu shot, for either regular seasonal flu or H1N1.  But whether or not one chooses to get one ought to be based on a realistic knowledge of one’s own health history and status, and that of one’s family or those with whom one comes into regular contact.

 

 They offer flu shots every year where I work (for Federal employees only, not the contractors, of which there are many), and most years I get one.  It seems to help ward the flu off, not infallibly, but a flu shot has never made me sick.  I have occasionally come down with it later in the year anyway; but there are lots of varieties of flu out there, and the seasonal flu shot is only good for whatever the popular flavor was the previous year and might be again this year.  I get the shot not only for me, but also for my immediate family (wife and daughter), who tend to get sick a lot and have chronic illnesses (diabetes and fibromyalgia for my wife, and asthma for my daughter).   And for myself, I seem to have an annoying tendency to develop pneumonia if I get a decent bug going.

 

This year, I did not get a flu shot at work, because I was sick when they were offering it.  With the flu.  Which I have had off and on for most of the last month.  By the time I felt better and was thinking about getting the shot anyway, they had run out of their supply.

 

I do not know for sure if I have had the H1N1 flu, since I did not get tested for it, and by the time I had decided that might be a good idea, it was really too late to bother.  It first appeared the last week of September, and then eased off (I thought it was gone) long enough for me and my wife to travel to Oregon for our nephew’s wedding.  Then it came back; went away again; and came back again.  It is mostly gone now.

 

Now, I had been led to believe that denizens of the geezer generation like me, who have been through an iteration or two of the swine flu and its kin in the past, are supposed to have some immunity to the current H1N1.  I still hope that is true, because I sure do not want anything worse.  This is a cruddy flu that, for me, made everything hurt, dissipated ambition for anything other than sleeping and sometimes listening to my new Woodstock box set, threw in some slight chills and yecchhiness early on, and hung on and on like your layabout offspring who can’t seem to find themselves a job.

 

Trust me, you do not want this.  I would not wish it upon anyone, not even the racists and fascists that some people see lurking under the kitchen sink.  Whether or not you get a flu shot (seasonal or H1N1) should be up to you, but at least remember to wash your damn hands whenever you get the chance, sneeze and cough into your sleeve or a tissue, and if you get sick, stay the hell home.  After a while, you will feel better, and so will everyone else.

 

30 September 2009

Likenesses

The rapture is to evangelical Christians what the “keys of the kingdom” given to St Peter are to Catholics.  Tendentious and willful misreading of rather slender lines of Scripture.

 

20 April 2009

At the X-Conference 2009

04-16-2009 06:00 PM:
At the X-Conference

I am now at the X-Conference in Gaithersburg, Maryland, or at least I've checked into the hotel. Registration is supposed to commence at 7 pm, and the conference sessions begin tomorrow morning. I have not seen any of the speakers yet, but I will go wandering around soon.

Unfortunately I do not have a camera, but I may go over to the local CVS drugstore and pick up a cheapie.

I'll try to post more as time allows.

04-16-2009 08:20 PM:

I have obtained a cheapo camera from CVS, and coffee from Starbucks, and walking back through the parking lot I passed Nick Pope. He didn't say anything, but the attractive young lady he was with smiled and said, "Hi!"

Just now in the lobby I saw Paola Harris pass through, and met a couple of guys who remarked on my Martin guitar cap. We chatted for quite a while about guitar picking, guitar pickers, and guitars. Not so bad, so far.

04-17-2009 06:27 PM:

So far today I have sat through terrific presentations by:

Richard Dolan, who has just completed Volume 2 of UFOs and the National Security State, covering the years 1973-91, which should be out in a couple of months. (I plan to get it.) He has a great deal of exhaustively researched information on the role of the non-governmental rulers of the modern world, and their interaction with and attempts to manage the UFO phenomenon. For one thing, he said that the Bilderbergers "made" the Presidents Ford through Bush I (at least), and almost casually suggested that they tried to kill Reagan. Hmm.

Colin Andrews, who gave a great and heartfelt lecture on both the UK government's role regarding the crop circle phenomenon--in which he had to refute a lot of the quasi-official things written by Nick Pope, who was in the audience and whom he said he continues to regard as a friend--and what he called "conscious" circles. Crop circles have emerged just because someone (among the researchers) mentioned the sort of formation they would like to see in conversation; and even Doug and Dave admitted that they didn't know exactly what drove them to make circles. This leads one to the notion that the crop circles are all consciously designed--no matter whether human actors are making them, or someone else is.

Alfred Webre, who looked at the coming of 2012 and our galactic alignment (which we are actually already in) through the lens of exopolitics. He is one who seems hopeful about what 2012 and the years following may bring, no matter how dire the events that may transpire then and after. One interesting thing he suggested was that money may come to be seen as a public utility like water and gas, and not a privately held commodity--held that is, he said, by the Rothschilds, who control the banks that make up the Federal Reserve.

Dr. Roger Leir, who presented a new case for the first time, in which the RF-emitting thingie that came out of a guy's toe came apart during the operation, but within two days, the fragments being stored in a vial of the man's blood serum were trying to reassemble themselves. The material was also analyzed and found to be made of meteoric iron, containing trace elements that are exceedingly rare on earth (including U238 but no other uranium isotopes) and may even be unlikely to come from this solar system.

That's it for now. I'm taking a few minutes to decompress from information overload and get ready for the cocktail party this evening.

Posted by Swerdloc on 04-17-2009 09:37 PM:

Back from the cocktail party, where they served up Chinese stir-fry, sort of, and had options for those of us who preferred tofu to beef, but had no Irish whiskey. There is an interesting mix of people, and I'm not really sure how to characterize them--or if one should, or can. Except that they all seem quite nice; it's a welcoming atmosphere. Where one can sort of relax, knowing that everyone around you doesn't think you're a nutjob for taking these matters seriously.

I'd like to get the chance to talk to Graham Hancock and Richard Dolan, at least, before this is over. I may not be able to supply pictures because the designated opportunity for a group speakers shot was orchestrated at the cocktail party, when I had left my cheapie camera in my room. There's always tomorrow and Sunday.

04-18-2009 02:28 PM:
Just a brief note between sessions

Graham Hancock was excellent this morning, as was Art Campbell with Bill Kirklin, and Nick Pope with Maj. Milton Torres. I got to chat briefly with Graham and with Richard Dolan. Next up this afternoon: Michael Salla, and the current host of weekday C2C.

Just trying to report what I'm seeing and get the message out, as Steve Bassett encourages.

Graham Hancock gave a great presentation largely culled from his 2005 book, Supernatural. I think I am definitely going to have to get it out and read it, even though it's rather weighty (i.e., a largish tome). He told me it's available in paperback, although for the paperback edition he edited down eight chapters on cave art to one (probably because of size and cost for reproductions); yet it's the cave art from thousands of years ago that really grabbed my attention in his lecture. He said he's just finished his first novel this week, which should be interesting.

Art Campbell and Bill Kirklin did a very interesting presentation on the incident at Holloman AFB in New Mexico, in February 1955, in which it appeared that President Eisenhower landed and then went into a flying disc that landed right by Air Force One, for a 40-minute meeting of some sort with whoever was in the flying disc. Another flying disc hovered nearby. They admitted that this was "hearsay" information, although Kirklin was at the base at the time and noted some odd occurrences relating to the visit of the President's plane which he was only able to put together 40 years later. Both of them seem quite credible.

Then Nick Pope gave a rundown of current UFO cases in the UK (within the last two years), and talked at some length about the UK's ongoing disclosure of UFO information. He also presented Maj. Milton Torres, ret., of the USAF, who also has a doctorate in mechanical engineering. Maj. Torres gave a very emotional account of being a fighter pilot stationed at Manston AFB, north of Dover on the Thames estuary in England, in 1957, when he was ordered into the air to chase and fire upon a UFO hovering over Ipswich, near Norwich. The UFO took off at something like Mach 10 when he locked onto it, and he did not fire. On returning to base, he was debriefed and told never to tell anyone, a condition that was only recently lifted by action of the UK.

Michael Salla presented a fascinating look at the possible prospects for disclosure--or at least something approaching UFO honesty--under the Obama administration, with a lot of detail on John Podesta's involvement with both the Clinton administration and his influence on the current White House. It's rather stunning to hear, over and over, about how Presidents have been determined not to have a "need to know" about UFO secrets, which begs the question: who determines this? Increasingly, it sounds like "black" nongovernmental, corporate, transnational entities that really run things in this world. The US Constitution becomes an irrelevancy.

The last speaker of the day was George Noory. Although I do have notes, I'll hold off on describing this presentation until I see a show of hands. Want to hear about it, folks?

04-18-2009 11:59 PM:

I have just come back from the banquet, which went on for a very long time, and I think I am going to have to save my observations for a slightly later time, because I need to get some rest. With one exception: one of the awards given out at the banquet was the annual Paradigm Research Group award for political courage, and it was given--in absentia--to John Podesta. Even though Podesta declined to show up to get the award, Steve Bassett wants everyone to know he won it.

Having heard only one objection (and you can ignore this or cover your ears or eyes if you wish), I’m going to report on George Noory’s “special presentation” at the X-Conference from roughly 4-6 pm on Saturday 18 April.  The talks given by Roger Leir, Graham Hancock, Edgar Mitchell, and John Alexander with Steve Bassett were also billed as “special presentations,” though none of them lasted two hours.

The presentation started late, as all of them did; the closest the conference came to being on schedule was 15 minutes behind.  Nevertheless, we had to wait a bit for Noory’s appearance, since Cheryll Jones, the host, and Bassett gave the introduction and left the stage, then nothing happened for a bit as we all looked around for Noory.  (All the other speakers just sat somewhere, generally near the podium, and came up when introduced.)  The C2C theme music came up, and then Noory finally came out from a side entrance and bounded up to the stage.  He’s a little dumpy-looking but not bad, of middling height, and he’s updated his hairstyle with a left-side part and a dye job the color of black shoe polish.  No kidding.  The moustache matches.

He greeted everybody, and talked for a while about the show, which he said is now up to 521 stations.  He said later, in response to a question, that they are going to work on the local affiliate, WMAL, which drops the last two hours in favor of a truckers’ show on weekdays; they broadcast the previous night’s program from the WMAL studios.

He had some kind of lame jokes but seemed genial enough, and quite sincere in his longstanding interest in and devotion to the “paranormal” and related subjects.  He played about ten clips from the show, including about five from interviews with presenters at the X-Conference, including Edgar Mitchell, Roger Leir (who he got up on stage to introduce his own clip), Nick Pope, Jeff Peckman, and Paola Harris.  Nothing too astounding there.

Then he took questions from a generally very friendly audience, which was probably the most entertaining part of the show.  He got one from “Jan from Brooklyn,” a very curious-looking little woman who carried some sort of red light in her hand.  Noory got her up on stage briefly.  She claimed the red light had various sorts of salutary effects on health and nutrition.  This is the same lady, who, in an earlier Q&A session with Graham Hancock, had said she underwent a serious negative experience after a shamanic ritual session six months before, which had left her saddled with a host of entities; but she said she had a machine at home that got rid of entities, though it took a month in this case.

Helping with the questions was Producer Tom (Danheiser), a rather hefty (some might say portly) youngish man with a recently-grown goatee about which Noory chided him.  Tom ran around with the microphone through the audience.

There was also a question from Nancy Burson, an interesting-looking woman who dressed in outfits in combinations of black and white that looked like they might be self-designed, and she asked Noory if he was familiar with the “extra-celestials,” a group with which she is in contact.  She said that they have altered her DNA, or given theirs to her, and she now produces or materializes golden pellets.  And crystals.  Noory offered to marry her if she really laid golden eggs, but she said they are actually quite small.

Then they set up a line for folks to meet Noory and have him sign things, he sitting behind a table on stage.  I left at that point, as did many others, although many also got right in line.

One of the presentations that made the biggest impression on me, or at least caused me to take a lot of notes, was that by Dr. Edgar Mitchell, on Sunday morning 19 April 2009.  He had  comparatively little in the way of prepared remarks, and spent most of his time in Q&A.  There were a LOT of Qs and As, but as a result, there is not a consistent organizing principle to his remarks—just lots of thoughts:

--“In the 21st Century, we will become part of the community of planets with intelligent life…” 

--He regards energy and matter as dyads, with matter being another expression of them same thing that energy is.

--To develop the technology to get humankind off the planet, outside the solar system—which we must do ultimately to survive as a species—he thinks we can do that by the end of this century, but we have first to bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity, and it’s not clear how we are going to do that.  He does not believe that string theory and similar approaches ultimately hold water.  (He doesn’t seem to be a fan of Michio Kaku’s ideas.)

--He once wrote a 100-page manuscript on the weaponization of space, but couldn’t find a publisher for it, and it still sits in his files.  Someone suggested he publish it on the internet, and he indicated he might do something like that.

--The questioners for Mitchell included Steve Bassett, Dr. Roger Leir, and Dr. Michael Salla, who all presented at the conference.

--He said, in response to a question, that he was not aware of any parallel astronaut corps or space program, though he thinks that NASA currently is pretty ineffectual.  The questioner suggested going to www.smdc.army.mil, which he said is the website of a military space defense command.

--He said he believes absolutely that there is nonhuman intelligence interacting with humankind and flying UFOs, though he stated that he did not see ET evidences on the moon, and was never briefed on UFOs while in the Apollo program.

--He stated that John F. Kennedy “pulled a decade out of the 21st century) into the 20th to win the space race.


A Few Final Observations

There were only two more presentations I saw through before leaving at about 3.15 pm on Sunday.

[b]Paola Harris[/b] gave a very entertaining and nicely illustrated, but not too thoroughly organized, presentation on Hollywood’s role in the UFO phenomenon and disclosure.  She focused a great deal, as might be expected, on Steven Spielberg—from “Close Encounters” to “E.T.” to “A.I.” to “Minority Report” to “Taken” and beyond.  She also evoked Geo. Lucas and Shirley Maclaine, but also brought in some earlier stuff like the original “Day the Earth Stood Still,” though she seems quite taken with Keanu Reeves too.  And she made serious mention of the works of both Jacques Vallee and Philip K. Dick.

Paola then spent a fair amount of time dwelling on the work of James Cameron, specifically “The Abyss,” and showed an extensive clip from toward the end of the film, in which the aquanaut played by Ed Harris encounters the powerful aliens at their far-undersea base, where they seem to have resided for quite some time.  Looks like it’s worth another viewing.

The last presentation I attended was a debate/dialogue between [b]Col. John Alexander[/b], a slightly sympathetic skeptic who has “engaged” the UFO issue, and [b]Stephen Bassett[/b] of PRG; “engaged” is Bassett’s term.  There was a significant difference in perspective between the two, starting with the fact that Alexander had brought slides (some of which he got shown) and Bassett had not.  They both came out dressed in black, wearing sunglasses, and sat down in easy chairs facing each other across a coffee table.

Alexander is a very bright and perspicacious man, retired USAF, who has worked at the highest levels of classification in the military and the Pentagon.  While he is not unsympathetic to the UFO issue—and believes it’s probably ETs—he buys, ultimately, the notion that the government is telling the truth.  He said that he has talked to all the “Theys” in the government and military, and while many or most of them have either had their own sightings or otherwise believe the phenomenon is real, everyone—every agency—assumed [i]someone else[/i] was dealing with it.  (Reminds me of the “someone-else’s-problem” field described in Douglas Adams’s books.  It’s different to an invisibility field, because while someone can see the “cloaked” object, you just think it’s “someone else’s problem” and ignore it.)

Steve Bassett kept trying to get Alexander to acknowledge, in some way, that no matter what the ultimate provenance(s) of the UFOs, it was in some major respect a political issue.  On this Alexander did not, would not, maybe could not budge.  He showed statistics indicating that, while the public generally believe UFOs are real, it is not a “voting issue.”  Steve kept pressing on WHY it is not, if in fact it is not.  Is it because the government, for whatever reason, has systematically, over many years and in many ways including misinformation, disinformation, and the encouragement of derision, persuaded the public that this is not a big deal?

Beyond that, what of the role of entities in authority outside of the government—the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the freakin’ Rothschilds and Rockefellers (!?!), who seem to not only exist but to control vast piles of money, taken largely or wholly from taxpayer dollars, who can determine if Presidents or anybody else has a “need to know” but who answer to no one but themselves?  (Or do they?  Where did those Annunaki go, anyway?)

Anyhow, that was it.  They ended on a kind of gag, in which they called up a slide of “Men in Black,” both Steve and Alexander put on their sunglasses, and Alexander pointed a wand with a red light at the end at the audience.

After that I packed up to go, since I was exhausted, but not before stopping at the PRG desk to ask Steve about volunteering as staff for next year’s X-Conference.  He said to send him an e-mail, and I will.

By the way, the attractive young lady with Nick Pope was Franky Ma, a reporter/presenter for Sky Channel 200 and apparently Nick’s main squeeze.  Way to go, Nick.



29 December 2008

Doctor Atomic

"Live at the Met" is showing, right now on PBS, a production of John Adams's opera "Doctor Atomic," about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the first atomic bomb test in 1945. My wife was watching it and called me in, thinking that I might wish to get a taste of what it is like. I watched as the Oppenheimer and Teller characters sang at each other--very atonally, with no melodic resolution whatsoever--about the advisability of testing "the gadget" before using it on the Japanese.

"Not really very hummable, is it?" I said.

"No," she agreed.

A little later, I couldn't help but say, "Why the hell did anybody write an opera about this?"

Then after watching a while more, I said, "It's very interesting, but it ain't what I call rock'n'roll."

She said, "It ain't what I call Verdi, either."


17 December 2008

The Current Status

Hung down, brung down, flung down.  Folded, spindled, mutilated.  Rode hard and put away wet.  Stomped on, tromped on, trodden upon.  Chewed up and spat out.  Wrung out, crumpled up.  Beaten up, beaten down, beaten around.  Ready for the light at the end of the tunnel to come back on.

15 March 2007

Wikipedia Teaches Me About Brackets

I have been feeling even more than usually out of the mainstream lately, having been beaten about the head, boxed about the ears, and generally assaulted on all sides by people yammering about "March Madness" and "brackets." "It's all about the brackets," someone on the radio says. On WTOP this morning they could hardly get any real news out of their mouths without bringing up March Madness and brackets. The weather and traffic were laced with it, lowering, I must admit, in some small measure, my esteem for Brian VanDeGraaf and Lisa Baden.
Yesterday I had the radio on for a while, and someone called in to Cerphe on 94.7 The Globe. Cerphe asked him how he was doing with his brackets, and what had been his biggest upset so far. (This was on 14 March.) The guy then went on to yak about some team from some school, and I found myself thinking that the tournament had already begun, else how could one have an upset? But this morning the news was filled with gleeful tidings that today, the Ides of March, was the first day of play.
And I couldn't understand what the fuss about brackets was about. Were they not pre-printed? Or was it an arduous job of hand copying that one had to endure?
It was obvious that I had little knowledge of these things that everyone (or at least the people getting on the elevator, and on the radio) else seemed to have absorbed deeply into their souls. Now I have no real interest in college basketball, and no teams I am morally bound to support. I wish them all well, but I don't have a dog in that fight and I don't really give a rat's rump who wins the NCAA. Or the NIT, for that matter.
It also should be clear that I have never participated in an office pool, not for March Madness or for football or for anything else. At bottom, I don't have any interest in gambling, or office pools, so that's not a big deal. It must be admitted that I have never been asked to participate in one. Not even remotely, obliquely, has anyone ever brought up the subject in a way that I might say, "Hey, could I get in on that?" Certainly no one has ever asked directly. That kind of thing doesn't happen to me; my vibrations don't work that way. (Took me many years to figure out that was what was going on.)
All of which left me with embarrassingly vague notions of how this March Bracketness thing works. To remedy this, I went to Wikipedia, which, however one might criticize it, sure has a lot of information on a lot of stuff. And this is what I learned:
The NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship is a single elimination tournament held each spring featuring 65[1] college basketball teams in the United States. Colloquially known as March Madness (as the tournament takes place mainly during the month of March) or the Big Dance (as opposed to the now smaller and less prestigious NIT), the tournament takes place over 3 weeks at sites across the U.S., and the national semifinals (the Final Four) have become one of the nation's most prominent sports events.
Since its 1939 inception (a brainchild of Phog Allen at the University of Kansas), it has built a legacy that includes dynasty teams and dramatic underdog stories. In recent years, friendly wagering on the event has become something of a national pastime, spawning countless "office pools" that attract expert fans and novices alike. All games of the tournament are broadcast on the CBS broadcast television network in the United States, except for the Opening Round game (or "play-in game" as it has been called), which aired on TNN in 2001, and ESPN since 2002.
March Madness is a popular term for season-ending basketball tournaments played in March (Brent Musburger is generally regarded as the individual who first used that phrase in conjunction with the college tournament, using it during CBS Sports' coverage of the tourney back in 1982 - see below), especially those conducted by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and various state high school associations. The phrase was not associated with the college tournament in 1939, when an Illinois official wrote "A little March Madness [may] contribute to sanity." March Madness is also a registered trademark, held jointly by the NCAA and the Illinois High School Association. The trademark has sparked a pair of high-profile courtroom battles in recent years.
March Madness refers to the frenzy these tournaments ignite among sports fans and, at least at the college level, sports gamblers. As it applies to college basketball, the term originally referred to the conference basketball tournaments, which occur in March just before the NCAA tournament begins, but in recent years has been used to refer to the NCAA tournament itself (the first weekend of which involves some 49 games, and which actually runs into early April). The term is now used in reference to both the men's and women's tournaments. The Big Dance also refers exclusively to the NCAA Tournaments to distinguish them from the conference tournaments and the NIT.

Brackets and picks

During March Madness, many people enjoy predicting the outcome of the NCAA tournaments. The first recorded "Bracket Pool" was originated by Raymond Van Stone in Fairfield , CT circa 1980. Van Stone was the Sports Information Director of Fairfield University and a sports writer for the Bridgeport Post at the time. Bracketology is the art of picking the correct teams that will be in the tournaments. The 65 (including the 2 teams who compete in the opening round game) participating teams are announced by the selection committee on Selection Sunday, although some teams are known to have made it already by winning their conference tournament (See: At-large bid, Automatic bid). The teams are seeded from 1 to 16 in 4 regional groupings around the country. The eventual winners of the four regions then meet at the Final Four in a predetermined location. The four seeds play out the tournament through single elimination until a National Champion is crowned.
As a tournament ritual, the winning team cuts down the net at the end of the regional championship game. Each player cuts a single strand off of the net for themselves, commemorating their victory.
Many people fill out tournament brackets in office pools. Entrance fees and legality of the pools themselves vary. Whoever accumulates the most points by accurately predicting the outcomes of the games wins the grand prize, most often pooled from the entrance fees. Points are assessed in different ways; one example is given below:
  • First round: 2 point per winning team.
  • Second round: 4 points per winning team.
  • Third round: 8 points per winning team.
  • Fourth round: 16 points per winning team.
  • Fifth round: 32 points per winning team.
  • Sixth round: 64 points for predicting National Champion.
The point total steadily increases by round in order to reward those players who correctly picked teams that would go further in the tournament.
If at the end of the tournament two players have the same point total, a tie is often broken by the total number of total points scored in the Championship Game.
So that's it. I don't imagine I will watch any of the games, or make any money, but I don't feel quite so ignorant any more.

20 February 2007

Shrove Tuesday 2007

Today is Shrove Tuesday, or Fat Tuesday or Mardi Gras, and I am feeling decidedly non-celebratory; in fact, discouraged about the state of the world and the state of life.  One hopes that this will pass, but first we have Lent to get through, always a cheery time of year.  At least it's warm enough so the ice has started melting.

11 February 2007

The Mayan Calendar

I've been thinking about the Mayan calendar, and why everybody seems to be so concerned about it. There’s a good article about the Mayans by Frank Joseph in the latest issue of Atlantis Rising magazine, in which he points out that the Mayan calendar—for their civilization, or for the particular age of Earth in which we and they find ourselves—begins precisely on 12 August 3113 BC, and ends on 21 December 2012 AD.

That gives us exactly 5125 years, 4 months, and 9 days. The Mayans, we are told, measured everything by the true celestial Great Year that corresponds to one full turn through the precession of the equinoxes, or about 25,765 years or so. http://www.crystalinks.com/precession.html

The period given by the Mayan calendar amounts to just about a fifth of that, but not precisely so, and we are repeatedly told that the Mayans were very precise, accurate folks when it came to mathematics and astronomy. So what’s up with the discrepancy? And why a fifth, or 72 degrees of the circle, a quincunx? Usually the magic numbers tend to come in threes or fours or sixes or twelves.

And another thing: the world as we know it did not begin in precisely 3113 BC, although I’m sure some swell things happened that year. That date doesn’t match up with the 4004 BC date or whatever it is that Bishop Ussher calculated for the beginning of the world back in the 18th century; or with the dating of the Jewish calendar; or the building of the Pyramids at Gizeh (no matter whether you like Zahi Hawass’s calculations or John Anthony West’s); or much of anything. [Yes, I know some sources will say that the first Egyptian dynasty and the founding of the city of Uruk happened right around 3113 BC. Other sources seem to think that the dates aren't nearly so neat--with a wiggle room of a few centuries.]

Things were happening long, long before that date, and I’m betting things will be happening on 22 December 2012 and for years to come. We may or may not like those things, but they will come to pass, and probably will be covered by CNN and Fox News. And people will still be listening to rock’n’roll.

13 April 2006

30 April 2005

Fluff

Your Birthdate: October 30
Your birthday on the 30th day of the month shows individual self-expression is necessary for your happiness.
You tend to have a good way of expressing yourself with words, certainly in a manner that is clear and understandable.
You have a good chance of success in fields requiring skill with words.

You can be very dramatic in your presentation and you may be a good actor or a natural mimic.
You have a vivid imagination that can assist you in becoming a good writer or story-teller.
Strong in your opinions, you always tend to think you are on the right side of an issue.

There may be a tendency to scatter your energies and have a lot of loose ends in your work.
You may have significant artistic talent and be very creative.

What Does Your Birth Date Mean?

28 March 2005

Astrologer Ray Grasse--Interview with Whitley Strieber

Astrologer Ray Grasse was interviewed by Whitley Strieber at the end of January 2005; the interview was only available to Unknown Country subscribers. Grasse’s astrological projections in the past have been very insightful and relatively free of personal bias. This is a brief summary of their discussion, which focuses on the coming year or two.

Grasse sees a coming upheaval relating to religion in the USA in 2005, as Uranus makes a hard angle (e.g., square or opposition--he didn’t specify) to the US natal chart Uranus. The times to watch, he said, will be the 1st to 10th of April, mid-June, and the end of August. He sees this centering on a conflict in the separation of church and state, and possibly scandal involving religious figures; he mentions almost a “civil war energy” being in play. Whitley discussed possible scandals that he is aware of involving religious and political figures, and brings up the “Finders” group of Washington, DC, which seems to have some very unsavory connections to child sex activities.

Grasse identifies the last 10 days of March 2005 as holding turbulent energies for the US and the world; likewise, he sees this for mid-July and the beginning of September, when he says we will see “secrets coming out.”

Giving a sort of rundown of the year, Grasse said he thinks we will make—or hear of—scientific breakthroughs in February, especially the 9th and 10th, and the period of 18-26 February, especially the 24th and 25th. He sees archaeological discoveries in February and March, particularly late March; also from the 10th to 20th of June, the last days of August, 10-16 October, and 13-17 November.

With regard to George W. Bush, Grasses definitely sees problems coming—either scandals or health problems, or both. From April 2005 through 2006 is a potentially accident-prone time for Bush, and hidden health problems may surface. He also sees him experiencing a great personal disappointment in June-July 2006, focusing on about the 4th of July next year.

Grasse feels there are parallels to the energies of the Viet Nam era, particularly with regard to the war in Iraq and the continuing loss of life there. Whitley mentioned his own family-related acquaintanceship with the Lyndon Johnson presidency, and its heartbreak over the deadly and seemingly (at the time) endless war.

Around mid-May, Grasse says, Mars will be making a hard angle with Uranus, which should evidence itself in upheavals around the world. This will also be true of the latter part of March and mid-June. He sees the world’s oceans and other bodies of water as the foci of earth changes, such as that being manifested in the quakes in the Indian Ocean.

27 March 2005

A test of the Emergency Broadcast System

This was only a test. If it had been an actual emergency, you would have been told to put your head between your legs and kiss your arse goodbye. In which case you might want to seek help.

Or try to get the Tardis away from wherever you are now...